Levitt’s Review Of “I’m Dying Up Here” (A-) (Showtime, Sunday, 10-11 PM E.)


When I began watching Showtimes, “I’m dying Up Here” I thought the tone of a show about comedians too despairing and similar  to the Tom Hanks/Sally Field film, “Punchline”. In Punchline, the impulse to do stand-up seemed more like a curse than a freedom.  The comedians were sufferers; unable to lead a normal life because they were addicted to the rush of performing. Too many times in these kinds of true-to life shows about comedians are depicted  comedians as only “on” when hit the stage and then, post-performance; collapsing in some sort of destructive/drunken cocoon in the corner.

The success of “I’m Dying Up Here”, though is that it successfully shows the comedians have three dimensional lives on and offstage. When not performing, There are numerous exchanges where each comic is just standing around shooting the shit and being normal knuckle-heads.  Other shows about comics also fall lazily into familiar templates; comedian as detached funny commentator (Gaffigan) or being a bottom-rung comedic pee-on (“Crashing”).  “Dying”, instead, presents a solid close-knit band of “working” comedians.  There are no break-out performers (save for the occasional visiting celeb or A-Lister).  By in large, each comedian is a-work-in-progress, honing their craft, and- aside from the inevitable jealousies- generally supportive of each-others success.

The show is full of talented real-life comedians and actors.  A stand out in the cast for me is the club owner, Goldie Herschlag  (Melissa Leo) who resists the greedy/grumbly stereotype and, though thick-skinned maintains a good. mature working relationship with her comics and a sporting interest in their careers. As the series progresses, it will be good to see more of her personal life take center stage…she might even get the itch to pick up the mic.


I also like the fire-cracker energy of Adam Proteau ( R.J. Cyler)  He is not as guarded as his contemporaries and has more raw vital presence on the stage and is interesting to watch and set him apart from the other comics.rj


Finally, Cassie Feder (Ari Graynor) shines as the show’s only female comedian.  The show’s writers do not make her cast as a typical salty/sassy Joan Rivers or Bette Midler over-sexed clone.  In fact, she disdains stock material in favor of a richer, more personal and confessional brand of humor that should yield rich dividends later on.


So far, in my review of “Dying”, I haven’t mentioned that the show is set in the 70s and that is, in large part, because I really don’t find the time frame to be that relevant to the show’s atmosphere.  The show is cast in the 70s because that’s when stand-up was king.  If people wanted to see comedy, they had to leave their homes to see the likes of Pryor or Carlin since there was no cable/internet outlets.  I think a strength of the show is that it doesn’t beat you over the head with 70s references or slang that takes you of the action. The 70’s setting is just atmosphere, man!

One of the show’s few negatives for me is the heavy-handed backstories.  The writers of “Dying” can’t seem to resist the temptation to make each comic the product of a bad home life.  Every comedian’s dad apparently drank too much and beat them up. Yipes, I wouldn’t want to be stuck in the audience at Caroline’s on Father’s Day ! Thankfully, though, the back-stories take a back-seat to the rich and realistic stand-up and the tight-knit relationships of the comedians.

Now that I’ve given this show a pretty great review, I thought I would temper my analysis with a little reality.

Although the writing and acting are first-rate, Here is why I feel the show might get cancelled.




Nobody On “Dying” is a Zombie, vampire, or otherwise living-challenged Individual

By comedian standards these guys are relatively normal earth-bound dudes.  nobody is drug-addicted (at least not violently so, sticking up a 7/11 at 2 in the morning to get enough money for “blow”).

The Lead actress is not a sex-pot-  Though attractive and talented, the lead actress is more interested in her career, than trying out out experimental, cinematically pleasing sex positions.

Nobody gets wacked every week–  Shows like Sopranos, True Blood, and Boardwalk Empire tended to like to sacrifice a different character every week to keep everyone interested and guessing.  Stand-up comedy,  although competitive,  is not exactly a blood sport.

Nobody is mentioning Trump or politics- Trump and political commentary are hogging the airwaves this summer with all the Russian/collusion shenanigans.  To me, my interest in Russia really peaked with Rocky 4.  But, This show with its occasional references to news or pop culture, (Billie Jean King V Bobby Riggs anyone?) seems miles away from being topical.











Levitt Spotlights Richard Dreyfuss Movies


Richard Dreyfuss is one of my favorite actors. up there with Paul Giamatti and Gene hackman. . Unlike many of our greatest actors Denzel Washington or Tom Cruise who command the screen and exude confidence, Dreyfuss constantly displays a jittery un-confidence…  sort of a Paul Giamatti after 6 cups of cofee. Dreyfuss nervous laugh and hyper delivery style make him always interesting to watch. His comic delivery style and smart alec quips also temper his more annoying roles.  His best characters are tense, creative types uncomfortable in their own skin, and display a restless, ambitious energy and usually brighter, more self aware than everyone around them, and are meticulous in their pursuit of perfection. You might meet the archetypal Dreyfuss character in the street while trying to hail a cab at the same time. His entitled behavior and insistence that his needs come first might grate on you initially but, at the end of 5 minutes, you’d probably find yourself agreeing that he probably was the most deserving of the cab and even offering suggestions on the best route.

The Rom coms


Dreyfuss is not your typical rom com actor. He looks smart not suave.  rude not charming. Frequently with approaching with a self-satisfied smirk, he looks more like a guy that will push you out of his way than kiss you.   So the films in which he shows his rom com chops are usually include a competitive spark where he spends a good amount of time fencing with his romantic partner and the woman usually succumbs not because of his innate charms but seem almost sucked into his competitive energy and passion for his work. What makes Dreyfuss’ RomCom films:  The Goodbye Girl (acting)and The Competition (piano) The Buddy System( novelist, inventor)  richer than your garden variety romcom is that they are not just about a romantic relationship but also about intertwining career with love.  Dreyfuss is not your typical pining lover. He meets his female co-stars on equal footing and they are frequently. swept up in his enthusiasm and passion for his work. The plot-lines in these films are not about misunderstandings, mistaken identity, or silly games. all his female co-stars know exactly where they stand with him. Instead their romantic rival is Dreyfuss’ work passion:acting excellent, piano playing excellence etc.  His co-stars  struggle comes when they find out how truly committed he is to his work. Amazingly, although Dreyfuss is pretty single-minded/strong in his pursuit of career, in most of Dreyfuss’ romcom style films he is generally very well matched with the woman.   In The Goodbye Girl, Neil Simon creates a vibe similar to Hepburn/Tracy (but funny) in which, Dreyfuss needy actor character runs off the rails into flights of arrogance, self obsession, or negativity.,  Marsha Mason skillfully reels him in.  Similarly, in “The Competition”, Amy Irving is the piano-playing rival/lover who frequently applies the breaks/pedal on Dreyfuss’ arrogance and makes him see things in perspective.  So often typical rom coms are just simply about the peaks and valleys of a relationship and that’s it . For example, in “When Harry Met Sally”  Whether Harry Sold aluminum siding for a living or Sally was an investigative journalist is irrelevant. It was barely mentioned and never explored. They are limited only to their feelings toward each other not to the greater world at large.

Richard the Geek


Dreyfuss also plays his share of geeks -(UFO Enthusiast, shark expert)  in Close Encounters he plays an obsessed with UFOS.  sort of a proxy for Spielberg.  A channeler of extra terrestials and the untamed forces of nature (shark expert in Jaws), His nervous, four eyed wonder is mirror for the audience member fascinated,  He’s not a square jawed schwartzenneger/stallone hero using their  fists and brawn to battle the unknown, Dreyfuss’ weapon of choice is a camera or a microscope. He’s not going to box with the aliens, stare them down, or insult their mothers  He’s there to observe and we follow along with his hyper rush for discovery. Knowing,  he’s no match so he stays out of the way, he is content to observe. fueled by scientific curiosity. The quest is made more interesting because of Dreyfuss’ volatile, twitchy energy. He is no staid lab coated technician working laboriously over a problem.  Instead, frequently Dreyfuss gets his hands dirty; diving into the water and entering a shark cage (jaws). He also builds alien sculptures with shaving foam or mashed potatoes and then even boards an actual alien ship at the end of the film. sure, in examining creatures of the earth or of other planets,  Dreyfuss may frequently outstay his welcome but he always does come in peace.

Richard Dreyfuss The Actor


The Goodbye Girl is probably Dreyfuss’ quintessential performance. In this film, Dreyfuss cares more than is seemly for public adoration. Normally, its more manly to downplay or hide outward ambition behind nonchalance. But  Dreyfuss is too full of ambition to content himself with just the love of a good woman his character also wants to be a famous stage actor.  His face and paunchy body displays all the nervous ticks for this hunger.  He practically jumps off the screen and begs the audience to give him an acting career.

Whose Life Is It Anyway-  This is the film in which Richard dreyfuss is stripped of his creative outlet as an actor and as subject in the film… his body.  He plays a sculptor who suffers a horrendous car accident rendering him quadriplegic and unable to sculpt. Dreyfuss must show a whole host of disparate,conflicting emotions all bedridden  Despite your feelings on the film’s theme or Euthanasia in general,the pure despair Dreyfus manages to capture in this flick is more potent than a lot of his sillier, more lightweight roles.

Mr Holland’s Opus– In this film all the trademarks of the Dreyfuss character are on full display, the ambition, the frustration, the meticulousness,. He embodies the typical teacher persona: surrounded by “Knuckleheads” who can’t truly appreciate his lessons and  The nagging feeling that he would always rather be somewhere else.   Scene after scene presents this conflict. But because Dreyfuss most enduring quality as an actor is always  his restless competitiveness, he is a great match for this character because,  Along the way he does get seduced to even excel in the very thing he hates: He becomes an excellent teacher.



Actors Who Can’t Do Accents

Some Film Actors like Meryl Streep are adept at playing characters with a whole range of different accents and regional dialects. However, some film actors who should be best kept nameless  but who I will now mercilessly name are best kept to their “mother tongues” because when they try to venture into changing the natural rhythms and cadences of their voices, the results are often quite painful to the human ear.

Park The Cah in Haavad Yaaad


Having gone to school in Boston, I know that the regional accents are often subtle. I can therefore categorically say that not everyone speaks like John F. Kennedy after a visit to the dentist.  Unfortunately, I don’t think Tom Hans or Rob Morrow ever got my memo.

Sure  Charles Van Doren famously lied about getting the answers on 21 in the film Quiz Show, but I believe the more grievous crime was Rob Morrow’s ridiculously thick “bahstonian” accent in Quiz Show. Its lucky he was a lawyer and not a dialect coach. His clients would sue.

Tom Hanks is a respected actor known for versatility in comedy and drama.  Yet accents are not his strong suit.  Even Forrest Gump where he must put on a southern accent is cartoon-ish and only aided somewhat by the reality that Gump was mentally challenged so therefore  spoke in a halting and overly deliberate way.  But, Hanks bizarrely bad boston accent in “Catch Me If You Can” cannot be attributable to any inferior intellect.  In this instance, Hanks character was in complete control of all his faculties…except for speech.

2 thick accents don’t mix


Russel Crowe is known for his intensity and dissolving into the characters he plays.  unfortunately his australian accent doesn’t always make the seamless transition.  In A Beautiful Mind or Cinderella Man  his accents it still sounds like a mix of australian/new york or australian/southern.  A mumble-mouthed jumble… a verbal concoction that savages two dialects in the process.  Maybe the more merciful way to go was to dub Crowe’s audio using another actor.



In the history of bad accents, Keanu Reeves should be given the gold trophy.  In the film Dracula, his accent is so bad you wish that a vampire would put an early end to his life. In the film, “Devil’s Advocate”, Keanu voices a southern accent so fowl, him and his law clients deserved death by lethal injection.  In fact, in most films Keanu seems even barely able to speak his native language, English, with any degree of fluency or meaning . When he is called on to speak, Reeves talking pattern is as awkward as any space alien or a 6 year old reading a Dick and Jane Book for the first time.

Holly Hunter- The accent from nowhere


Holly Hunter has an eccentric sounding southern accent which she cannot shake and even sounds out of place in films in which her characters are supposed to have southern roots. Simply put,  her voice doesn’t exactly match her face.  When watching any of her films, you might always find yourself asking,  Why does this character have this weird southern accent?    So film-makers almost have to concoct a colorful backstory to explain why Holly Hunter has an eccentric southern drawl…ie her character often summered in a farm in rural Arkansas. fittingly, she Hunter was honored for an Oscar for  her work in the Piano, in a role in which she did not speak out loud.

Speak Russian?  Nyet!


I think its safe to generalize and say that most actors cannot do a convincing Russian Accent. Inevitably, they all sound like some variation of “Boris” from the old Bullwinkle Cartoon . For instance  John Malkovich’s ridiculously over-the-top accent in “Rounders”. If he tried that voice in real life, He’d be laughed out of any self-respecting Russian Bathhouse or denied service in any restaurant in Brighton Beach, Brooklyn which served pirogis. Thankfully, in the film “Inside John Malkovich” the actor was not called upon to to illicit any  particular foreign accent. The last thing you’d want to be is trapped in his subconscious or the scene with the multiple malkovich’s all speaking in bad Russian continuously. Nyet, Definitely Nyet!

Levitt Reviews Sit-Coms


I grew up with situation comedies.  Tuesday nights I would watch the Happy Days, Laverne Shirley Block.  In the 80s it was Cosby (pre-Gloria Alred) and Family Ties. 90’s it was Seinfeld/Friends/Cheers etc.  If I ever felt nostalgic/needed a palette cleanser, I could always watch Dick Van Dyke, Mary Tyler Moore or Bob Newhart on reruns.  Of course, my favorite sit-com of all time would have to be All In The Family.  Its re-runs are still brilliant and laugh out loud funny.

Sitcoms were always easier to watch than Dramas. They don’t require as much focus on plot, the characters are always wittier than your classmates/workmates (no offense) and their characters don’t, like real life people, fall into periods of long moroseness and self-involvement (always fun to be on the receiving end of one of those phone calls/text chats).

The proliferation of gritty dramas about crime scenes, hospital rooms, FBI stakeouts, and of course reality shows has, through the years, made sit-coms an endangered species. I, myself, find that choose to watch more drama and reality shows than sit-coms because of the action, acting, and ever increasing sensationalist storylines (How To Get Away With Murder) or sexy subplots (Masters Of Sex, The Affair) that keep you gripped week after week.

But, endangered or not, there are still at least 8-10 Sit-Coms currently on air that deserve attention.  So, here’s my list of the worthy and the not so worthy.


The Big Bang Theory-  On for nearly 10 years, the show is now about half as funny as it used to be. I think the point at which the show “jumped the shark” to use a Happy Days term was the addition of Amy Fowler (no offense to Mayim Bialik). her joining with the show’s most nerdy member finally solidified the more domesticated/normalized nerds and made the much more like every other sit-com on TV and removed a lot of its outsider, satirical bite. Many complain that the characters are too much alike now and the show is more and more like “Friends” every day.  All that is true but,  Its instead my firm contention that, generally speaking, characters who are getting steady sex and involved in productive/satisfying relationships are simply just not very funny.


Two Broke Girls-  This show is, to me, probably the funniest right now of the workplace comedies.  Sure the banter is wittier than people, given their situations/background should be allowed and this show features more raunchy insults and pop culture references than you can shake a stick at and sure, the accents of some of the characters (sophie and Oleg) are like nothing else in nature but for sheer volume of put-downs, one-liners, and sheer ridiculousness, this show probably wins all categories. Def worth a check out.


Mom- Mom is my favorite sit-com on the air right now.  It has just the right blend of heart and humor to make most of its half hours truly satisfying.  The characters are not cookie cutter sit-com types.  Nearly each character is suffering from addictions so the usual preachy or condescending tone of a lot of family comedies is gone.  Instead, is very self aware characters (Bonnie- Mom, feisty, flawed, and largely amoral) played by the great Allison Janey and her more ethical/neurotic daughter (Christy) played by the no-slouch-herself, Anna Farris.  The two main characters have an atypical, sparring relationship that only goes to mom/daughter things when it needs to and never beats you over the head with anti-drinking platitudes.  When the characters do relapse into addictions, they do so semi-believably and hilariously and can always bounce off each other for ways to cope.  Chuck Lorre is expert at these Odd Couple, two and a half men blendings to mine for humor and pathos and the chemistry here of Allison Janey and Anna Farris is as good, if not better than anything else on sit-coms today.

Other honorable mentions:

Impastor- novel premise, likeable lead and supporting characters. has promise but doesn’t have quite enough satirical bite to be a good comedy about religion. More like a middling one like Amen with Sherman Helmsley.

Younger- Thin premise.  Woman pretends to be younger than she is to land a job. Isn’t that pretty much everyone, men too? Also  There’s really not that much of a generation gap between 27-40 that a good coloring job and some pop culture references can’t hide. The actress is likable and perky enough but physically cannot pass for younger than 35-37 on a good day.  Supposedly a comedy but lacks any real funny lines. Only the lead actress is really made into a 3 dimensional character so far.







Levitt Reviews “The Martian” (B)


“The Martian” is the most recent in the rash of survivalist flicks where one man or woman must use their ingenuity and fortitude to survive against a cruel and unforgiving environment.  Films like The Castaway and Gravity also pit their lead largely sole, character against a war of wits and humanity against mother nature or in this case “Space Nature” to stay alive.

I think they key to a major factor on whether a lot of these films being successful is the vulnerability of the lead actor. They must convey the loneliness and desperation of their struggle for us to totally emphasize and get invested in their struggle. Unfortunately, Matt Damon the film’s star and the lone astronaut who is marooned  on Mars after a horrific storm, is known for having a cool calm demeanor on screen. “The Martian is no exception.  Damon is, in large part, missing the  “oh shit, I’m alone on a desolate planet factor”  Its a little like watching Denzel Washington try to play helpless on screen. It doesn’t totally work.   The film needed someone with more vulnerability, more emotional subtlety in their performance. In addition in many scenes Matt Damon is seen being snarky (railing against disco etc) which, while funny and made him more likable removed me from the complete seriousness of his situation.

Matt Damon was, of course, thought of for this film for his star power but I think Damon should have refused for the good of the movie.  I think Matt Damon is too interested in being in control in the acting projects he chooses i.e. his ego wont allow him to play someone inept or deeply flawed.  In any film he chooses,  he has to show he’s the best, the most qualified character in the film. He played a card genius in Rounders, top CIA Assasin in The Bourne Films, in Good Will Hunting he was a math-genius janitor and Even in this film, he’s the self proclaimed best botanist on Mars!

Damon’s screen strength/arrogance also doesn’t play well when you consider that his crew has to go completely (and a bit unrealistically rogue, taking them a year off course, risking their lives, and in complete contradiction to direct orders) to complete a daring rescue of him in space.  Damon’s demeanor, to me, doesn’t inspire loyalty.  I had the same problem with Damon in “Saving Private Ryan” when after he was rescued by Hanks and his men,…they came all this way just to save Matt Damon?! and too top it off, he didn’t even seem to care about their sacrifice.

Because Damon is so unpreturbed throughout much of the film its Its up to the other characters to show their worried. Other actors particularly NASA engineer Mindy Park (played by mackenzie Davis) does an excellent job and conveying the nervousness and range of emotion necessary to be empathatic.  I think she should have played the marooned astronaut and left Damon to play some unconcerned Nasa bureaucrat instead.

The first half of the film the action is told in large part of Damon making a video diary of his daily life on the planet, gradually by degrees is able to grow food (whattaya know he just happens to be a botanist…that’s a lucky break!) and gradually able to communicate with nasa. Soon, complications, technical failures, and the barren-ness and oxygen less enviroment take their toll.  At times things do get a bit slow in the action as Damon is forced constantly to confront adversity and work each situation through in a math-like way to arrive at a solution. Soon, I almost wanted some kind of Mars Monster to come out of a crater and attack Damon to relieve the monotony and so Damon could bust out some cool Judo moves or something.  Instead there are long stretches of Damon planting crops, rationing food, and although interesting a documentary way were at times a bit dull.

I did enjoy the secondary characters in the film, Damon’s crewmates especially “Rick Martinez”, Michael Pena, are fun and Chwietol Ejiofor, who plays Dr. Vincent Kapoor, head of NASA’s Mars missions, conveys the humanity largely missing from Damon.   Less successful I thought was Kristin Wiig who seemed out of place in a cast of otherwise earnest actors. She’s not horrible but always looks like she’s holding back something that she thinks is funny so took me a little out of the action.

In the final analysis, I liked The Martian Okay but aside from Matt Damon’s casting, I generally have a problem with all vehicles which are largely one man shows like The Castaway with Tom Hanks. To be completely engaged on all cylinders , to borrow from aircraft jargon, I prefer more conflict, friction/clashing of wills, multi-person viewpoints to get lost and feel a stake in the action.  One actor, no matter how gifted, cannot frankly play all the sides of the same issue and, in this case, if you’re not totally in love with Matt Damon, you won’t be totally in love with “The Martian”.

Levitt Rips Apart Classic Films

Notting Hill- Julia Roberts, she crazy!!!!!


Most people who enjoy the film, “Notting Hill”like the charming bi-play between the movie star (Julia Roberts) and the commoner/befuddled travel book-shop owner, Hugh Grant.  But, if you bother to look for logic and realistic reactions (in a romcom are you crazy?!!!) it does seem that Julia Robert’s character is simply batshit crazy.  Instance 1: after grant spills coffee all over Robert’s blouse (something that normally drives celebs crazy—when their clothing is suddenly  and randomly attacked by a stranger) Roberts suddenly kisses Grant full on the lips.  Instance 2: Alec Baldwin (julia’s former lover) surprises Roberts in her Hotel Room its a little bit awkward with Hugh Grant there so Roberts, like any rational woman in the same situation, decides to… leave the country.  Instance 3:  Roberts and Grant are photographed in skimpy attire after emerging from Grant’s Notting Hill Flat so, rather than explaining/holding a press conference or simply avoiding reporters for a while, Robert’s thinks its safer/more incognito to, you guessed it, leave the country. Then, finally when Roberts realizes that she truly loves Grant, she decides to give him a token of her affection and gives him an original Marc Chagall painting.  I guess they were out of Whitman Samplers at the Drug Store.

Dreamgirls- Jamie fox’s Acting Has Left The Building


 Jamie Fox is one of our most reliable actors his breakout performance in Collateral and Oscar Winning Turn in Ray show his versatility and gift at characterization.  It is astounding, then, that in a film so highly regarded for its music and acting (Eddie Murphy and Jennifer Hudson both Oscar nominating and winning) that Fox seems to stink up the screen so much. In re-watching the film recently, I couldn’t hit upon one scene in which Fox seemed to be reacting realistically to what was around him. He grins, smirks, and stares wide-eyed at each set of circumstances like he was some random guy that just wandered onto the set off the street.  Even in the ending frame when he is supposed to be shocked to discover that Effie has a daughter and that he might be somehow connected to her birth (ya think?) his expression seems as real and genuine as Gary Coleman’s expression when he says, “Wotchu talkin’ bout Willis”.  I’m not sure why Fox sucks so bad in this film and why its never talked about in any review but I urge you to watch it again and convince me he’s not the Jar Jar Binks of Dreamgirls.

Other Things that always bothered me about other classic movies?

*Rob Morrow’s thick “bahstonian” accent in “Quiz Show” more scandalous than any cheating going on by Van Doren


In “Good Will Hunting” why does the plagiarizing dick at the Harvard Bar tell Matt Damon’s character that he likes apples?  I know it sets up the verbal beatdown line by Damon, “I got her number, how about them apples” but the pony-tailed dick doesn’t seem the apple munching type.  I’m thinking a nutrition bar is more in his wheelhouse.


*In Whiplash, why does the film’s protagonist, Andrew break up with Nicole, Melisssa Benoist?  I guess its to paint him as more as a drumming fanatic who doesn’t have time for romance in his life. it does seem rather abrupt in the film and Benoist’s character was the least cloying girlfriend I’ve ever seen depicted in film.  Also, she went on to be TV’s Supergirl, so I think Andrew missed the boat a bit there too.


*Mr Holland’s Opus- Those who can’t do Teach


Throughout the bulk of Mr Holland’s Opus, Teacher Glen Holland cannot find the time to compose a symphony which, if the story would have us believe, once completed will net him fame and riches.  Its a little hard for me to believe that in a teaching career of 30 plus years that-no matter how busy he is- the man cannot string together 10 minutes here and there (bathroom visits, waiting for a bus, getting up an extra 10 minutes early for work) to finish one piece of music but so be it.

At the tail end of the film though, the man does finally manage to complete /peform his “American Symphony” in front of a full auditorium of his most adoring students and faculty and…well, the piece just is not all that good. Its bombastic enough but very repetitive/derivative and does not exactly leave Johann Sebastian Bach quaking in his grave and I have never, outside of this film, ever heard anybody else ever using this piece of music for anything ever. They should just have ended the film with the inspiring speech about his students being his opus blah blah and perhaps had ended the film with a more classic musical composition.  So,the unintended irony I’m left with is not that Holland had a fuller life (just like in Its A Wonderful Life) because he touched people but, in actuality, that he made the correct career decision because he was an effective and inspirational teacher but a lousy, or at least un-inspiring composer.

Actors Who Are Always Cast In The Same Roles

Ron Rifkin


how many roles can this man get playing the concerned father? Age, it seems,has not been kind to him. He looks high strung and particular. constitutionally, He just looks like the kind of guy who would send his food back a couple of times and still eat it under protest demanding extra table condiments. Maybe Rifkin should consider going on along vacation where he can just decompress…or maybe someone should just give him a token emmy or tony already so he can just breathe out already.

Leslie Mann


 Perennially cast as the Taken-for-granted and ignored wife in such films as The Other Woman, 17 again, knocked up, and this is 40. She’s in so many bad marital relationships in films and always plays the victim. However, now my assumption, as an audience member, is that she’s in so many failing relationships, that maybe she’s the problem. Instead of my sympathy going out to her, now I’m like what is wrong with you that you’re driving all these men away? Analyzing her movie work, I’ve come to the conclusion that her “go to”acting expression when the camera is on her is a cutting smirk where she seems to be  looking at her husband and seems to be thinking: “geez look at this guy, I could have done so much better”. Maybe if she looked less like she was constantly rating her husbands like a good watermelon, maybe she would be cast in more happy marriages.

Michael Cera


cast as the well-intentioned nerd in such films as Juno, Scott The Pilgrim, and Superbad and just about everything thing else he ever did. Obviously, his physical wimpiness and high pitched voice would preclude him from being cast in traditional male roles who display even the smallest amount of testosterone. Yet, once Cera begins to age and bald, what roles will be left? An old nerd in film/TV is just creepy. So, what’s left for Cera except for playing outlier freaks or pedophiles? except for perhaps being cast as “Karl” in a new Stage Version of “Slingblade”?, what new acting challenges lay on the horizon for this dorky dude? My advice for Cera is to enroll in both a weight-training class and an actors “Voice Deepening” workshop to expand his repertoire.

Judy Greer


 An Obligatory actress. Ever try and read her IMDB Page? don’t. You’ll have more success trying to slog through James Joyce’s Ulysses. She’s cast In virtually everything as the best friend with flexible morals. But, why is this actress in virtually every movie or TV show. Her on-screen personna doesn’t incite an immediate connection in the same way that Reese Witherspoon or Tom Hanks do. Her acting chops though decent are not undeniable enough to make a director cry out out “get me Judy Greer!” But she gets so much work she appears to hold the balls of Hollywood in an iron vice. Its gotten to the point that if a TV Show has been on for more than 3 years, they should just install an electronic countdown timer to how quickly Greer will be cast as something. I’m not really sure why Greer is in everything. Is her agent on steroids? does Hollywood have some kind of back- room Judy Greer Quota? Her appeal is truly mysterious to me. The only thing I can think of is that casting Judy Greer never threatens the other actors while on set or distracts from their star-power when on the screen. Simply put, she blends. Therefore, Hiring her presents a low-risk factor to film/tv producers who are interested in the bottom line. To a thespian, clasicallytrained in the method of Stanislavsky, there can be no higher artistic praise!